Вода, богата на водород, предотвратява сепсис и увреждане на черния дробНаучно Изследване

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis is defined as a clinical syndrome caused by an amplified and dysregulated inflammatory host response to infection. The critical syndrome is characterized by hyperthermia or hypothermia, tachypnea, tachycardia, changes in white blood cell count, positive fluid balance with edema, hemodynamic changes, and organ dysfunction (1). There are several potential sources of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in sepsis including mitochondrial electron transport chain dysfunction and xanthine oxidase activation as a result of ischemia and reperfusion, respiratory burst associated with neutrophil activation, and arachidonic acid metabolism (2). Gram-negative bacterial endotoxins, or lipopolysaccharides (LPS), are released into the circulation from sites of bacterial infection and induce secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, primarily tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL) 1-β, and IL-6 (3). Since LPS administration in mice represents an established in vivo model of sepsis with severe hepatic dysfunction, mouse models of acute liver disease during sepsis are used (4).

The heme oxygenase (HO) system is one of the key regulators of cellular redox homeostasis responding to ROS via HO-1 induction and its transcription is regulated by nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) (5). HO-1 functions in the heme salvage pathway, removing the pro-oxidant free heme by converting it to bilirubin, a known antioxidant molecule, and carbon monoxide (CO), a potent vasodilator. CO negatively regulates endothelin 1 (ET-1) at the message level in endothelial cells (6). ET-1 is a potent endogenous vasoconstrictor and plays an important role in the pathophysiology of endotoxin shock and liver dysfunction (7). Previous studies have shown that ET-1 stimulates the production of ROS, primarily superoxide anions, leading to the development of oxidative stress, which is associated with increased lipid peroxidation (8).

We previously reported that molecular hydrogen (H2) selectively reduces ROS, hydroxyl radical, and peroxynitrite (9), and inhalation of H2 gas markedly suppresses ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury of multiple organs (10). H2 administration reduces inflammation in experimental animal models of disease induced by LPS with decreased levels of proinflammatory cytokines (11, 12). Hydrogen-saturated drinking is safer and more convenient than inhaling H2 gas, which is explosive when the concentration in air is greater than 4%. Many studies have shown that drinking H2-dissolved water (HW) can reduce oxidative stress in several organs including the brain, lung, liver, kidney, and intestine (10). In a rat model of Parkinson disease, drinking HW was found to be more effective than inhaling H2 gas (13). Furthermore, after drinking HW, the H2 concentration in the brain was too low to be detected using a conventional hydrogen sensor (9). These findings indicate that H2 in HW potentially protects various organs around the gastrointestinal tract with a higher and detecarticle H2 concentration, which further ameliorates neurodegeneration.

HW may be useful in preventing or minimizing diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and stroke. However, there are insufficient studies on the beneficial effects of drinking HW on a daily basis. The present in vivo study indicates that administration of HW before LPS injection sufficiently attenuates liver injury in mice. Preadministration of HW after LPS injection prolonged survival and reduced oxidative stress in the liver with increased expression of HO-1 and reduced ET-1 expression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

C57BL/6J male mice (weighing 19–22 g, specific pathogen-free) were purchased from CLEA Japan Inc (Tokyo, Japan). Mice were housed at 20°C to 22°C with a 12-h light/dark cycle and provided with sterile food and water. All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering during experimental procedures. All protocols for animal use and experiments followed the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication No. 86-23, revised 1985). All study protocols were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care Committee of the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology. Animals were sacrificed at predetermined endpoints using asphyxiation by CO2 or via exsanguination under deep anesthesia with combined anesthetic agents according to a previously described method (14). In brief, three different anesthetic agents were mixed and administered by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection in the mice. The mice were administered 0.75 mg/kg of medetomidine hydrochloride (Domitol, Meiji Seika Pharma, Tokyo, Japan), 4 mg/kg of midazolam (Dormicum, Astellas Pharma, Tokyo, Japan), and 5 mg/kg butorphanol (Vetorphale, Meiji Seika Pharma). Following induction of sepsis, animals were checked twice daily for 3 days. Moribund animals were sacrificed using humane endpoints.

Administration of HW to a mouse model of sepsis

HW was prepared using a previously described method (15). In brief, H2 gas (grade 1, Iwatani, Tokyo, Japan) was dissolved in reverse osmosis water under high pressure (0.4 MPa) to a super saturated level in a stainless-steel tank (Unicontrols, Tokyo, Japan). Saturated HW was poured into closed glass vessels equipped with an outlet line containing two ball bearings, which prevented the water from being degassed. Approximately 80% saturated H2-water (640 μM) at 0.1 MPa RT was used as HW. During preparation of HW, we carefully monitored H2 concentration in room air by H2 sensor with alarm for safety. Water obtained by degassing H2 from HW with gentle stirring overnight was used as a control. Mice were given water freely and the vessel was freshly refilled with HW or control water at 6:00 PM every day.

To determine whether HW ameliorates LPS-induced death, 7-week-old mice were randomly assigned into four groups: control water 3 days before and after LPS injection (Ctl group), HW 3 days before and after LPS injection (HW group), HW 3 days before and control water after LPS injection (preHW group), and control water 3 days before and HW after LPS injection (post-HW group). Mice drinking control water and HW 3 days before saline injection were used as a negative control, respectively (Fig. 1A). LPS (O127:B8, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo) was dissolved in saline and injected i.p. at a dose of 30 mg/kg.

"F1-12"
Fig. 1:

Preadministration of HW improves the survival rate and body temperature in a mouse model of sepsis.A, Schematic diagram of the protocol for the administration of HW in a mouse model of sepsis. Mice were administered control water 3 days before and after LPS injection (Ctl group), HW 3 days before and after LPS injection (HW group), HW 3 days before and control water 3 days after LPS injection (preHW group), and control water 3 days before and HW 3 days after LPS injection (post-HW group). B, The Kaplan–Meier curve representing the survival rate of mice in the sepsis model. After LPS injection (LPS [+]), survival rates were significantly improved in HW, preHW groups. * P <0.05 versus Ctl group. Note that there is not a significant difference between HW and preHW groups. C, Amounts of daily drinking water. Noteworthy, amounts of drinking water decreased substantially and immediately after LPS injection. D, Thermographic images of the body temperature of mice 24 h after LPS injection. E, Quantitative analysis of the body temperature of mice 24 h after LPS injection. *** P <0.001 versus LPS (+) Ctl group. HW indicates hydrogen-dissolved water; LPS, lipopolysaccharide.

To determine whether preadministration of HW attenuates LPS-induced liver injury, 7-week-old mice were randomly assigned into four groups: control water 3 days before saline injection, preadministration of HW 3 days before saline injection, control water 3 days before LPS injection, and preadministration of HW 3 days before LPS injection. After the injection, all mice were given control water freely. Their blood for biochemistry and tissues for histochemical studies and protein analysis were obtained at 24 h after the injection.

Thermal images

To determine whether HW ameliorates LPS-induced hypothermia, 7-week-old mice were randomly assigned into three groups described above: Ctl group, HW group, and preHW group. Mice drinking control water and HW without LPS injection were used as negative control, respectively. Thermal images were obtained from mice prior to and 24 h after LPS injection using a thermographic camera (FLIR, Wilsonville, Ore).

LPS activity

To determine whether H2 directly affect LPS activity, LPS was dissolved in control water and HW, respectively, and the activity was examined using E-TOXATE kit (Sigma-Aldrich).

Measurement of H2 concentration in the liver and kidney

The H2 concentration was sequentially measured in the liver and kidney using a needle-type H2 sensor (Unisense, Aarhus N, Denmark). The tip of the sensor was indwelled into the liver or kidney under anesthesia with the aforementioned mixed anesthetic agents. First, the H2 concentration was monitored for 7 min after oral administration of control water (400 μL) with a feeding needle. After subsequent oral administration of HW (400 μL), the H2 concentration was further monitored.

Serum TNF-α and IL-6

Seven-week-old mice were randomly assigned into three groups: control water without LPS injection, control water 3 days before, and after LPS injection and HW 3 days before and control water after LPS injection (preHW group). At the indicated time, blood was collected from the eye. Serum TNF-α and IL-6 concentrations were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn).

Serum biochemistry

Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were determined according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Wako, Osaka, Japan). Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity was determined using a kit in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (Nittobo, Tokyo, Japan).

TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay

Apoptosis in the liver was determined in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded liver tissue samples, which were cut in 4 μm sections. Following deparaffinization and rehydration, sections were further processed according to the manufacturer’s protocol (TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) Apoptosis Detection kit, Millipore, Billerica, Mass). Final color reaction was achieved using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) chromogenic substrate (Sigma-Aldrich). The numbers of positive cells in randomly selected 10 fields of view were counted at a final magnification of ×200 for each section using a light microscope.

Immunohistochemistry

8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE) were stained in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded liver tissues, which were cut in 4 μm sections. Sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and microwaved in 10 mM citric acid (pH 6.0) at boiling temperature for 5 min. Endogenous peroxidase was inhibited by 0.3% H2O2 in PBS at RT for 20 min. Sections were blocked with goat serum and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary monoclonal antibodies against 8-OHdG (2.5 μg/mL, JaICA, Fukuroi, Japan) and 4-HNE (25 μg/mL, JaICA). After washing, sections were incubated with biotinylated secondary antibody against mouse IgG (1:300, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) at RT for 60 min, and further incubated with horseradish peroxidase (1:100 in ABC kit, Vector lab, Burlingame, Calif) at RT for 30 min. DAB chromogenic substrate was used to achieve a color reaction. To quantify immunointensity of each section, 10 fields of view were selected randomly and photographed at a final magnification of ×200 using a light microscope. The obtained images were converted into gray scale and their level of density was obtained by using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md).

HO-1 was stained in liver tissues fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Wako), which were cryoprotected with sucrose, frozen, and cut in 5 μm sections. Sections were incubated with 10 mM citric acid (pH 6.0) at boiling temperature for 5 min. Endogenous peroxidase was inhibited by 0.3% H2O2 in PBS at RT for 20 min. Sections were blocked with goat serum and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary polyclonal rabbit antibody against HO-1 (1:100, Proteintech, Chicago, Ill). After washing, sections were incubated with biotinylated secondary antibody against rabbit IgG (1:150, Vector Lab) at RT for 60 min, and further incubated with horseradish peroxidase (1:100 in ABC kit) at RT for 30 min. DAB chromogenic substrate was used to achieve a color reaction. The numbers of positive cells in randomly selected 10 fields of view were counted at a final magnification of ×200 for each section using a light microscope.

ET-1 was stained in liver tissue snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, which were cut in 5 μm sections, and fixed in acetone at −20°C for 20 min. Sections were incubated with 10 mM citric acid (pH 6.0) at boiling temperature for 5 min. Endogenous peroxidase was inhibited by 0.3% H2O2 at RT in PBS for 20 min. Sections were blocked with goat serum and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary polyclonal rabbit antibody against ET-1 (1:100, IBL, Fujioka, Japan). After washing, sections were incubated with biotinylated secondary antibody against rabbit IgG (1:150) at RT for 60 min, and further incubated with horseradish peroxidase (1:100 in ABC kit) at RT for 30 min. DAB chromogenic substrate was used to achieve a color reaction. To quantify immunointensity of each section, 10 sinusoids were selected randomly and photographed at a final magnification of ×200 using a light microscope. The obtained images were converted into gray scale and their level of density in sinusoidal endothelial cells was obtained by using ImageJ software.

Western blot analysis

Liver tissues were homogenized in RIPA buffer and centrifuged (15,000 g at 4°C for 20 min), and the supernatants were collected and stored at −80°C. Denatured proteins (10 μg in each lane) were separated on a 10% acrylamide gel and electrotransferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane. The PVDF membrane was blocked with skim milk and incubated at 4°C overnight with primary polyclonal rabbit antibody against HO-1 (1:500). After washing, membranes were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:10,000) at RT for 1 h. Protein bands were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (ECL prime, GE Healthcare, Chicago, Ill) and visualized using an exposure and quantitation system (LAS-3000 mini, FUJI film, Tokyo, Japan). As a normalization control, the membranes were reprobed for 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and exposed to polyclonal rabbit antibody against GAPDH (1:1,000, Cell Signaling, Danvers, Mass).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 22.0; SPSS, Chicago, Ill). The survival rates were analyzed with log-rank test. All values are presented as means ± standard deviation. Statistically significant difference between the groups was determined by a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett test. Results were considered significant at P <0.05.

RESULTS

Preadministration of HW prolonged survival in a mouse model of sepsis

To determine whether HW ameliorates LPS-induced sepsis, the survival rate was compared between the Ctl and HW groups (Fig. 1A). Treatment with HW significantly prolonged survival at 72 h (57.7% vs. 26.9%; *P <0.05) (Fig. 1B). The amount of drinking water substantially decreased after LPS injection, resulting in no significant difference between the Ctl and HW groups (Fig. 1C), suggesting that drinking HW before i.p. injection may suffice in prolonging survival. The survival rate of mice administered HW 3 days before and control water 3 days after LPS injection (preHW group) was examined (Fig. 1A). Preadministration of HW for 3 days significantly improved the survival rate (50.0% vs. 26.9%; *P <0.05) (Fig. 1B), while postadministration of HW for 3 days after LPS injection (post-HW) did not improve the survival rate (28.6% vs. 26.9%; not significant). There is not a significant difference between HW and preHW groups. The body temperature of mice 24 h after LPS injection indicated that preadministration of HW ameliorated LPS-induced hypothermia (Fig. 1, D and E).

To exclude the possibility of direct inactivation of LPS by H2, we examined LPS activity in water with or without H2, and found that the activities were not different between them, within 0.013 to 0.04 endotoxin units/mL, indicating that H2 does not inactivate LPS directly.

Secretion of proinflammatory cytokines was not prevented by preadministration of HW

To determine whether preadministration of HW attenuates LPS-induced secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, serum TNF-α, and IL-6 levels were measured. TNF-α levels increased dramatically in mice drinking control water 1 h after LPS injection (Fig. 2A), which was not reduced in mice pretreated with HW (preHW group). Differences were not observed at 6 and 12 h after LPS injection. Similarly, preadministration of HW did not attenuate an LPS-induced increase of IL-6 (Fig. 2B).

"F2-12"
Fig. 2:

Preadministration of HW does not markedly ameliorate an elevation in inflammatory cytokines.(A) TNF-α and (B) IL-6 concentrations in serum were measured at 1, 6, and 12 h after LPS injection. HW was preadministered for 3 days before LPS injection (preHW). The number of animals used in each group is 8. *** P <0.001 versus LPS (+), preHW (−) group. HW indicates hydrogen-dissolved water; IL, interleukin; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.

Drinking HW elevates the concentration of H2 in the liver

The liver and kidney are two major organs that are susceptible to LPS toxicity during sepsis (16, 17). The H2 concentration was sequentially monitored in each organ using a needle-type H2 sensor. After administration of 400 μL HW containing 640 μM H2 with a feeding needle, the H2 concentration in the liver was immediately elevated, with a peak of approximately 16 μM H2 (Fig. 3A). The H2 concentration was not observed to be elevated in the kidney after HW administration (Fig. 3B). These results suggest the possibility that H2 derived from HW directly and effectively reduces susceptibility of the liver to LPS.

"F3-12"
Fig. 3:

H2 concentration in the kidney and liver after oral administration of HW.HW was administered 7 min after oral administration of control water with a feeding needle. The tip of the H2 sensor was indwelled into the liver (A) or kidney (B) under anesthesia. H2 indicates hydrogen; HW, H2-dissolved water.

Preadministration of HW attenuates LPS-induced liver injury

To determine whether preadministration of HW attenuates LPS-induced liver injury, liver tissues were stained with hematoxylin and eosin 24 h after LPS injection. Nuclear condensation, fragmentation, and blood congestion were observed in the liver of mice drinking control water (Ctl group), whereas liver injury was suppressed in mice pretreated with HW (preHW group) (Fig. 4, A, C, and D). Apoptotic cell death was examined using the TUNEL assay 24 h after LPS injection. Preadministration of HW resulted in a reduction of the increase of TUNEL-positive cells in the liver (Fig. 4, B and E). In mice drinking control water, LPS injection resulted in an increase in ALT, AST, and LDH levels, whereas preadministration of HW significantly attenuated their increase (Fig. 5). These results indicate that preadministration of HW sufficiently attenuates LPS-induced cellular and functional injury of the liver.

"F4-12"
Fig. 4:

Preadministration of HW improved septic liver injury.(A, C, and D) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the liver 24 h after LPS injection. Black arrow heads indicate nuclear condensation and fragmentation in hepatocytes (upper in A). Black arrows indicate blood congestion (lower in A). Quantitative analysis of blood congestion area in vessels in the liver 24 h after LPS injection (C). Percent area of vascular congestion was calculated as a blood cell-occupied area per cross-section area of vessel in the liver (0.5 mm2). Quantitative analysis of hepatocytes with nuclear condensation and fragmentation in the liver 24 h after LPS injection (D). Percent positive cells per total cells in field of view are shown. (B, E) Apoptotic cells in the liver visualized by the TUNEL assay 24 h after LPS injection. Preadministration of HW for 3 days before LPS injection (preHW) resulted in decreased liver injury and TUNEL-positive cells (B). Quantitative analysis of TUNEL-positive cells (E). Number of positive cells per total cells in the field of view is shown. * P <0.05, ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001 versus LPS (+), preHW (−) group. HW indicates hydrogen-dissolved water; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; TUNEL, TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labeling.
"F5-12"
Fig. 5:

Preadministration of HW improved hepatic function.Serum biomarkers of hepatic function, AST, ALT, and LDH were measured 24 h after LPS injection. HW was preadministered for 3 days before LPS injection (preHW). * P <0.05, ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001 versus LPS (+), preHW (−) group. ALT indicates alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; HW, hydrogen-dissolved water; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LPS, lipopolysaccharide.

Preadministration of HW attenuates LPS-induced oxidative stress in the liver

Several studies have reported that treatment with H2 reduces oxidative stress in both organs and cultured cells (10). We examined the levels of two oxidative stress markers, 4-HNE and 8-OHdG, by immunohistochemical staining. Twenty-four hours after LPS injection, the number of 4-HNE and 8-OHdG-positive cells was dramatically increased in the liver of mice drinking control water (Fig. 6, Supplement articles 1 and 2, https://links.lww.com/SHK/A515). Preadministration of HW resulted in fewer 4-HNE and 8-OHdG-positive cells, indicating that preadministration of HW reduces LPS-induced oxidative stress in the liver.

"F6-12"
Fig. 6:

Preadministration of HW decreased LPS-induced oxidative stress in the liver.Immunohistochemical staining of the oxidative stress markers 8-OHdG and 4-HNE in the liver 24 h after LPS injection. A, Preadministration of HW for 3 days before LPS injection (preHW) resulted in decreased immunostaining of both 8-OHdG and 4-HNE. B and C, Quantitative analysis of immunointensity of 8-OHdG and 4-HNE. * P <0.05, ** P <0.01, *** P <0.001 versus LPS (+), preHW (−) group. 4-HNE indicates 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal; 8-OHdG, 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine; HW, hydrogen-dissolved water; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LPS, lipopolysaccharide.

Preadministration of HW enhances HO-1 expression and attenuates ET-1 expression in the liver

The HO system is one of the key regulators of cellular redox homeostasis. We examined HO-1 expression in the liver by immunohistochemical staining. The number of HO-1-positive cells was observed to increase in the liver of mice drinking control water (Fig. 7, A and B and Supplement article 3, https://links.lww.com/SHK/A515). Western blot of liver extracts revealed that LPS injection resulted in an increase in HO-1 expression (Fig. 7, C and D). Preadministration of HW significantly enhanced HO-1 expression, suggesting that increased HO-1 reduces the accumulation of LPS-induced oxidative stress in the liver.

"F7-12"
Fig. 7:

Preadministration of HW increased LPS-induced HO-1 expression.A, Immunohistochemical staining of HO-1 in the liver 24 h after LPS injection. B, Quantitative analysis of HO-1-positive cells in the liver. Percent positive cells per total cells in the field of view is shown. * P <0.05. C, Immunoblots of HO-1 in the liver 24 h after LPS injection. GAPDH was used as an internal control protein. D, The expression levels of HO-1 are quantified by the intensity of each protein immunoblot and normalized to the intensity of samples derived from mice untreated with both LPS and preHW. Pre-administration of HW for 3 days before LPS injection (preHW) resulted in further elevation of LPS-induced HO-1 expression. * P <0.05, ** P <0.01 versus LPS (+), preHW (−) group. GAPDH indicates 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; HO, heme oxygenase; HW, hydrogen-dissolved water; LPS, lipopolysaccharide.

CO, a HO-1 product, negatively regulates ET-1, a potent endogenous vasoconstrictor, which is highly expressed in the septic liver and stimulates the production of ROS. ET-1 expression was examined in the liver of mice 24 h after LPS injection. Immunohistochemical staining of the liver with an ET-1-specific antibody revealed an increase in ET-1 expression in endothelium after LPS injection, whereas preadministration of HW significantly reduced the increase (Fig. 8 and Supplement article 4, https://links.lww.com/SHK/A515).

"F8-12"
Fig. 8:

Preadministration of HW decreased LPS-induced ET-1 expression.A, Immunohistochemical staining of ET-1 in the liver 24 h after LPS injection. HW was preadministered for 3 days before LPS injection (preHW). B, Quantitative analysis of immunointensity of ET-1 in hepatic endothelium. * P <0.05, ** P <0.01 versus LPS (+), preHW (−) group. ET-1 indicates endothelin; HW, hydrogen-dissolved water; LPS, lipopolysaccharide.

DISCUSSION

The present study demonstrates that preadministration of HW is sufficient to prolong survival in a mouse model of sepsis (Fig. 1). After LPS injection, preadministration of HW attenuated liver injury with a decrease in oxidative stress; however, an early LPS-induced increase of proinflammatory cytokines was not attenuated (Fig. 2). This indicates that preadministration of H2 does not affect an immediate, early, amplified, and dysregulated immunological response.

H2 administrations by inhalation of H2 gas, injection of H2-dissolved saline, and drinking of HW have been shown to prevent LPS-induced sepsis (18–21). However, a target site(s) of action and a target molecule(s) for the physiological function of H2 remain unclear. The liver and kidney are two major organs that are highly susceptible to LPS toxicity during septic shock in mice (16, 17). In the present study, HW administration was shown to induce an elevation of the H2 concentration in the liver (16 μM), whereas H2 was not detected in the kidney (Fig. 3). The concentration of H2 has been reported to be elevated in the liver (10–20 μM) after HW administration in rats, whereas a modest elevation was observed in the kidneys (approximately 0.3 μM) (22). Our results and those of the aforementioned studies indicate that the H2 concentration in the kidney is too low to prevent direct cellular damage. It can be assumed that one of the major target sites of H2 derived from HW administration is the liver. In a previous study, sepsis-induced liver dysfunction was found to be strongly associated with mortality (23).

The survival rate of LPS-induced sepsis in a mouse model was prolonged by HW preadministration, indicating that H2 derived from HW does not directly reduce LPS-induced ROS (Fig. 6). Indeed, HW postadministration during higher production of ROS did not improve the survival rate (Fig. 1). On the other hand, inhalation of H2 gas and administration of H2-loaded eye drops for I/R injury exerted the effect when H2 was inside the brain and eyeball at the onset of reperfusion (24), thereby directly reducing a toxic ROS, ·OH, which is produced during I/R. Different mechanisms underlying the protective effects of H2 between inhalation of H2 gas and drinking of HW can be assumed.

Interestingly, Sato et al. (25) reported that preadministration of HW in mice prevented in vitro ROS formation in the brain. In their study, brain sections were prepared after freely drinking HW and ROS formation was subsequently measured during hypoxia and reoxygenation in vitro. ROS formation was found to be suppressed in the sections from HW-treated mice. In the present study, preadministration of HW resulted in improved hepatic injury (Figs. 4 and 5) with suppression of oxidative stress markers and enhanced HO-1 expression (Fig. 7). The increased HO-1 most likely resulted in an amelioration of LPS-induced 8-OHdG and 4-HNE accumulation in the liver. Upregulation of HO-1 with hemin was reported to prevent D-galactosamine and LPS-induced hepatic injury in rats (26). HO-1 expression is transcriptionally regulated by nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2. Kawamura et al. (27) reported that inhalation of H2 gas during exposure to hyperoxia improves blood oxygenation, reduces inflammation, and induces HO-1 expression in the lung via Nrf2 activation. Moreover, H2 regulated endothelial injury and the inflammatory response via Nrf2-mediated HO-1 levels, suggesting that H2 may suppress excessive inflammatory responses and endothelial injury via the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway (28). Preadministration of HW may potentially enhance antioxidative activities via the adaptive response. Drinking HW resulted in the upregulation of genes for oxidoreduction-related proteins in the rat liver (29). To understand the precise mechanisms underlying the protective effects of HW-preadministration, we need to investigate physiological changes before and/or just after LPS injection.

The LPS-induced decrease in body temperature and congestion in the liver were significantly improved by preadministration of HW (Figs. 1 and 4), indicating that HW improves a decrease in blood flow. Furthermore, the LPS-induced increase of the endogenous vasoconstrictor, ET-1, in the liver was ameliorated by the preadministration of HW (Fig. 8). Previous studies suggest that HW may improve vascular endothelial function. Flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery was shown to improve after administration of HW (30). In our recent study, H2-containing buffer was found to reduce hepatic reperfusion injury via the maintenance of portal venous flow and ameliorated ET-1 elevation in the liver (31). The observation of HO-1-deficient mice suggests that the lack of HO-1 allows for a sustained induction of ET-1 message in the liver (32). However, CO, a HO-1 product, negatively regulates ET-1 at the transcription level in endothelial cells (6). An increase of HO-1 induced by preadministration of HW is assumed to result in reduced ET-1 expression in the liver.

Despite significant advances in antibiotic therapy and intensive care, sepsis remains the most common cause of death in intensive care units, with in-hospital mortality rates reported to be between 20% and 30% in the United States (33, 34). The present study demonstrated that preadministration of HW is useful in preventing or minimizing the risk of sepsis. Clinical trials on drinking HW on a daily basis in patients with sepsis are urgently required. However, LPS is not a reliable surrogate for human sepsis (35). Further investigations whether the preadministration of HW improves septic shock in the model of polymicrobial sepsis should be addressed.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Yoshihiro Noda and Yasuko Hasegawa for technical assistance.


Пълно съдържание на доклада:

оригинално заглавие (букв. прев.): Предварителното приложение на богата на водород вода предпазва от индуциран от липополизахарид сепсис и намалява чернодробното увреждане

Автори:

Masumi Iketani, Jumi Ohshiro, Takuya Urushibara, Mayumi Takahashi, Tomio Arai, Hideo Kawaguchi, Ikuroh Ohsawa

DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000810

-

Резюме:

Въпреки значителния напредък в антибиотичната терапия и интензивните грижи, сепсисът остава най-честата причина за смърт в интензивните отделения. По-рано съобщихме, че молекулярният водород (H2) действа като терапевтичен и превантивен антиоксидант. Тук показваме, че предварителното прилагане на H2-разтворена вода (HW) потиска индуцирания от липополизахарид (LPS) ендотоксинов шок при мишки. Пиенето на HW в продължение на 3 дни преди инжектирането на LPS удължава преживяемостта при миши модел на сепсис. Концентрацията на H2 веднага се повишава в черния дроб, но не и в бъбреците след пиене на HW. Бяха изследвани защитните ефекти от предварителното приложение на HW върху LPS-индуцирано чернодробно увреждане. Двадесет и четири часа след инжектирането на LPS, предварителното приложение на HW намалява увеличаването както на апоптозата, така и на оксидативния стрес. Освен това, предварителното приложение на HW засилва LPS-индуцираната експресия на хемоксиганаза-1 и намалява експресията на ендотелин-1. Тези резултати показват терапевтичния потенциал на HW за предотвратяване на остро увреждане на черния дроб с намаляване на увеличаването на оксидативния стрес. HW вероятно ще предизвика адаптивни реакции срещу оксидативен стрес.

НОВО
За пръв път в България
Водородна Терапия Процедури в Медицински Център

във Варна и София

Варна

ДКЦ1 „Света Клементина“, Варна
гр. Варна, бул. Съборни 40

(бивша „Градска болница“ – до Централна поща, зад Катедралния храм)

Телефон за записване:

+359 895 640 352
(сестра Милена Великова)

Ръководител на отделение:

д-р Вероника Гаджовска,
Инфекционист

София

ДКЦ 30, София

гр. София, Ж.К. Обеля 2, ул. 108

Телефон за записване:

+359 884 01 69 54

МЦ „Превиста“, София

гр. София, ул. Цар Асен 90

Телефон за записване:

+359 885 012 111

5 процедури
125лв.
(25 лева за процедура)
ЗАПИСВАНЕ

най-избирано 15 процедури
360лв.
(спестявате 15лв.)
ЗАПИСВАНЕ

най-изгодно 25 процедури
550лв.
(спестявате 75лв.)
ЗАПИСВАНЕ

Молим, натиснете съответния бутон, за да се свържете
с медицинския център, намиращ се в града,
в който желаете да провеждате процедурите:

ВАРНА - 10895 640 352

ДКЦ 1 „Света Клементина“, Варна

СОФИЯ - 10884 01 69 54

ДКЦ 30, София

СОФИЯ - 20885 012 111

МЦ „Превиста“, София

Водородна Терапия
вкъщи

HBS10 e апарат за водородна вода и инхалации с водород, с който всеки може лесно да прилага водородната терапия в домашни условия. Апаратът произвежда минимум 450 милилитра водороден газ в минута. С това покрива международно приетите стандарти за инхалационна терапия с водород.

Произведен с гордост в България,
на база над 10 годишен опит в производството и разработката на водородни технологии

Хроматографски изследван в БАН
Сертифициран СЕ
Тестван и Препоръчан от H2HUBB, САЩ

Повече за HBS10 Поръчайте Онлайн

HBS10 - Апарат за Водородна Терапия